MD5 checksum incorrect on downloaded .DMG file

Mark48

Bit poster
Hi,
Hopefully someone else here can confirm the following and help support to understand the problem.

The MD5 hash of the file available for download at https://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/support/ doesn't match the value published on the web page. See the attached file. I receive the same MD5 sum when I download in different browsers. I get the same at work as well.

Given the lengths malware makers go to I am skeptical of trusting any software that doesn't match the hash value on the publishers web site. I hope that Parallels simply published the wrong value, but I've been unable to get support to understand the problem after a month of trying!

Thanks for your help!

Mark
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-01-10 at 16.09.28.png
    Screen Shot 2022-01-10 at 16.09.28.png
    766.5 KB · Views: 9
Hi,
Hopefully someone else here can confirm the following and help support to understand the problem.

The MD5 hash of the file available for download at https://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/support/ doesn't match the value published on the web page. See the attached file. I receive the same MD5 sum when I download in different browsers. I get the same at work as well.

Given the lengths malware makers go to I am skeptical of trusting any software that doesn't match the hash value on the publishers web site. I hope that Parallels simply published the wrong value, but I've been unable to get support to understand the problem after a month of trying!

Thanks for your help!

Mark
Hi, kindly mention the source websites or links here from where you have tried to download Parallels installation file and notice the MD5 hash value difference.
 
Hi, kindly mention the source websites or links here from where you have tried to download Parallels installation file and notice the MD5 hash value difference.
Please see the original post. I have provided a link to the web page.
On the web page there is only one link with a MD5 hash.
The picture attached to the original post shows the problem visually.
Thank you,
Mark
 
Back
Top