PragmaticPraxis
Bit poster
Gentlemen,
My apologies for the delay in the investigation.
@PragmaticPraxis, according to the technical report your virtual machine is located on the external USB 2.0 disk (WD Passport). If yes, then we strongly recommend you move the VM to the internal Mac disk. USB 2.0 I/O bandwidth is not enough to handle VM disk operations properly.
@RodB, The Apple hypervisor was indeed added in Parallels Desktop version 12 as an optional (I would say even experimental) hypervisor driver. Apple hypervisor comes short of the following matters comparing to the Parallels hypervisor:
- Performance: slower on VM startup and shutdown
- Stability: may crash more frequently
- Functionality loss: no PMU, nested virtualization, thermal monitoring, energy profiling
Parallels Hypervisor is the best one.
Please try to reduce the number of CPUs to 2 and set 4096MB of vRAM to the virtual machine. Please let me know if this helps.
Dmitry,
For what it's worth, I have been using external drives (USB2, USB3, FW800 & TB1 & TB2) for YEARS with my many test VMs, through many versions of Parallels and MacOS, and using both Windows 7 and Windows 10. Never had a SINGLE issue as a result. Until the latest build of Parallels. So, it certainly feels as if this advice is just more delay and obfuscation and general failure. Oh, and I have the same issues with my production VM that IS on the system drive, which is an SSD. So yeah, drive performance isn't the issue.
As for reducing the CPU count, what exactly did we pay for with the Pro version then, if it's so gimped it won't work unless we use it like the cheaper non pro version? I know, the best performing, most stable, most value adding Parallels is the one that isn't running, because I'm using VMWare now. Sorry to be so snarky, but jack shit for a meaningful response over multiple MONTHS is a little hard to swallow, for a "premium", "professional" product.
And yes, I still want my money back. Parallels Pro is a ripoff.