Vulkan Support (add app titles in the comments)

[DashtonP]

Now that DX11 is implemented, I'm wondering how easy it would be to implement Vulkan support as well (for games like Doom 2016 etc.)?

 

[UltimatronX]

I agree. I'm trying to run yuzu, the Nintendo Switch emulator on macOS, and it requires Vulkan support...right now the alternative is to install Zink for OpenGL 4.x support on macOS, through MoltenVK, and I'm not very eager to dive into that due to limited resources and knowledge.

 

[Wafeeqrox]

helps alot for emulation as well

 

[levulop808]

Ran into the Quake Remastered issue tonight as well. Vulkan support would be much appreciated!

 

[elliotb1]

I also want to run yuzu and cemu and vulkan is pretty much required, I just bought an intel mbp and refuse to restart just to game, people buy parallels to use from macOS, please support your intel users and add vulkan support.

 

[JeremyR9]

Bump for Vulkan Support, I'm holding off on buying Parallels until it is supported

 

[JeremyR9]

I would love it if Parallels supported Vulkan, if I could run No Man's Sky on Windows via Parallels, I'd buy Parallels in a heart beat. Add my request to the growing list.

 

[SergeiP2]

Bump for Vulkan Support, I'm holding off on buying Parallels until it is supported

 

[JPJ1]

Need Vulcan support to play on my M1 Mac, No Man's Sky and Doom Ultimate. Please.

 

[JonathanA9]

Need Vulcan support to play on my M1 Mac, No Man's Sky and Doom Ultimate. Please.

I completely agree. We need Vulkan support and DirectX 12 support so we can play modern games on Parallels.

 

[CarlosC18]

When would Vulkan be supported in Parallels? I'd purchase a subscription if I could run Detroit on it. Please

 

[kunze50]

It will have to be implemented soon or the current Autodesk client base would abandon ship. Autodesk has road mapped the use of Vulkan in future releases.

 

[JoshuaJ5]

I want this too

 

[anonymous3]

Would love to see vulkan support inside of linux vms.

 

[AndrejsC]

It will have to be implemented soon or the current Autodesk client base would abandon ship. Autodesk has road mapped the use of Vulkan in future releases.

Do the developers reply in the forums?

 

[Biagio Paruolo]

+1

 

[BrettB7]

+1 for this too. With the advent of new M1/M2 Macs, and not able to dual boot, we have to rely on Parallels for Windows dev work. Vulkan support would allow us to continue to use Parallels for our dev work.

 

[Cesar5]

+1

 

[BerndL6]

Vulkan support would be a game changer for us as game developers. If done well maybe this could be an option for fans of our games, to run games on powerful M1 / M2 macbooks. Please consider!

 

[TimK13]

Honestly, without Vulkan support, and with only OpenGL 3.3 available.. my use case for Parallels is a increasingly diminished.

I'm a game developer, I mostly focus on OpenGL and increasingly Vulkan. Having the ability to target these frameworks via Parallels is of great benefit to me, as a developer.

I may yet explore DX11 (which is supported), and perhaps one day DX12 might become an option.. but the world is bigger than Direct-X

I may have to ask for a refund on my Pro subscription until Parallels can offer up a roadmap that meets my objectives.. until then, I'll just keep using a Remote Desktop to a real PC.

 

[joestrout]

I'm with you. As a Unity developer, if I can't test my Unity apps in Linux under Parallels, then I have no reason to use Parallels at all. And from googling around, it's pretty clear that Parallels does not care about this issue at all.

Anybody know if VMWare works better?