I have read in a number of place on the net, which probably are copying each other, that the new Apple MacBook Pro 17", in its default 2.66 GHz configuration would be using the Intel P9600. Unless the Intel website itself is in error, this would mean this computer would not benefit from the virtualization extensions which seem absent from this model.
Has someone found other information? Maybe they are all wrong and they use the T9550 (same watts) instead of the P9600 ?
Similarly, it looks like the only 2.93 Ghz intel core 2 duo processor (mobile at least) with 6M cache and 1066 FSB would be the T9800. And that processor does have VT but lacks Intel64!! I can't believe that with the extended 64 bits capabilities of Snow Leopard, that top of the line, upgraded latest MacBook Pro would use a processor missing the Intel64 instructions.
If these informations are true, it means the 2.66 model is a bad choice for using Parallels on it and that the 2.93 upgrade wouldn't be that clever too, missing the 64 bit.
?
Has someone found other information? Maybe they are all wrong and they use the T9550 (same watts) instead of the P9600 ?
Similarly, it looks like the only 2.93 Ghz intel core 2 duo processor (mobile at least) with 6M cache and 1066 FSB would be the T9800. And that processor does have VT but lacks Intel64!! I can't believe that with the extended 64 bits capabilities of Snow Leopard, that top of the line, upgraded latest MacBook Pro would use a processor missing the Intel64 instructions.
If these informations are true, it means the 2.66 model is a bad choice for using Parallels on it and that the 2.93 upgrade wouldn't be that clever too, missing the 64 bit.
?