Processor Usage comparison 1896.2 and 3120.0
I was curious to see what was going on with people saying high processor usage.
Since my needs were mainly met with 1896.2 I hadn't upgraded for quite a while.
Setup is WinXP with SP2 (768MB / 1536MB initial/max paging file)
VM 764MB memory, 15GB "hard drive"
So took down the following numbers from Activity Monitor:
1896.2
20% CPU usage active / .9% paused
37.37MB Real / 424.06MB Virtual memory
3120.0
12-17% Active / 3-4% paused
264MB Real / 2.28GB Virtual memory
I was surprised on how much more Virtual memory the new version is allocating.
I am not seeing the high CPU usage other are, is it possible folks have something running in VM in the back ground? (AntiSpyWare, Antivirus, small apps???) thats increasing the usage?
I was curious to see what was going on with people saying high processor usage.
Since my needs were mainly met with 1896.2 I hadn't upgraded for quite a while.
Setup is WinXP with SP2 (768MB / 1536MB initial/max paging file)
VM 764MB memory, 15GB "hard drive"
So took down the following numbers from Activity Monitor:
1896.2
20% CPU usage active / .9% paused
37.37MB Real / 424.06MB Virtual memory
3120.0
12-17% Active / 3-4% paused
264MB Real / 2.28GB Virtual memory
I was surprised on how much more Virtual memory the new version is allocating.
I am not seeing the high CPU usage other are, is it possible folks have something running in VM in the back ground? (AntiSpyWare, Antivirus, small apps???) thats increasing the usage?