Parallels Desktop 16 and Windows 10. Windows is extremely slow with 100% processor load

M

MHofmann1965

Bit poster
My Windows 10 Pro 2004 in the 64-bit version under Parallels Desktop 16 is extremely slow and the resource monitor shows a processor load of 100%.
I installed Windows 10 with an ISO DVD.
When booting into Windows, it takes 10 minutes before you can work at all.
When you click on the Windows symbol, it takes 30 seconds for the shutdown menu to open and another 10 minutes for it to shut down.
This is not a useful condition.
I've read through here in the forum and tried everything: Without success.
Now, through many tests, I have found the right setting where Windows runs quickly and smoothly (at least for normal Office applications).
Boot time until you can work: 20 seconds.
Time-consuming operations such as Windows 10 cumulative update: 5-10 minutes.
Open Word 2016: 20 seconds. That's enough !
My hardware:

Apple Mac Pro Early 2008 (3.1) w. 2 Intel Xeon 2.9 GHz (= 8 cores with 2.9 GHz)
16 GB of RAM
Graphics card Nvidia GeForce GT 630 with 2 GB RAM (metal-capable)
1 TB SSD (Samsung 860 EVO)
macOS Catalina 10.15.6 with patch for use with unsupported Macs
Parallels Desktop 16
Windows 10 Pro 2004 in the 64 bit version (installation from original ISO DVD)

Catalina runs very quickly and without problems. I use Photoshop and video editing software and it all goes super fast. With 8 cores with 2.9 GHz, no wonder.
The default setting is activated at Parallels:
Windows 10:
Processors used: 2
Storage: 3.5 GB
Adaptive hypervisor: On
Graphics card: memory automatically

Result: As described above, Windows 10 is extremely slow.
Now I thought: more processors = faster.
Processors used: 4
Boot time now: 30 minutes. Click on the Windows symbol: something happens after 2 minutes.
Shutdown: approx. 30 minutes.

So again 2 processors but adaptive hypervisor: off
No improvement. Boot time just under 10 minutes.

So more RAM allocated:
4 GB: no improvement
6 GB: no improvement
8 GB: no improvement

Graphic card:
a lot of RAM (2 GB): no improvement
little RAM (64 MB): no improvement.

I was at the end of my game !!

Now one last act of desperation (although illogical):
Processors: 1

Lo and behold: Windows is super fast!

Now after a few tries my final setting:
Processors used: 1
Memory 4 GB (4096 MB)
Adaptive hypervisor: Off
Graphics card: memory automatically.

Windows 10 is now fast and usable.

And now the hit, where I let myself be misled:
It is still displayed on the Resource Monitor:
Windows 10: CPU 100% and RAM 4.1 GB
And in the system tray it says CPU usage between 30 and 100%
Significant CPU is used: Windows Services
And even if the CPU is red (100%), Windows runs quickly and smoothly.

These tips are meant to be of help to anyone who has a similar problem!
greeting
Michael Hofmann
 
Hello Michael,
Thanks a lot for sharing your detailed experience with us and other users.
We have one question to you, did you perform any steps on the Windows side? Did you try the clean boot for example?
 
No. I haven't taken any steps on the Windows side. I haven't tried a clean boot either.
I only made all the settings described in Parallels Desktop. Windows was installed as normal via an ISO DVD.
I haven't made any adjustments in Windows.
Apparently there is only the performance brake if you set more than one processor for Windows, although my Mac have 8 cores.
greeting
Michael Hofmann
Germany
 
MHofmann1965 said:
No. I haven't taken any steps on the Windows side. I haven't tried a clean boot either.
I only made all the settings described in Parallels Desktop. Windows was installed as normal via an ISO DVD.
I haven't made any adjustments in Windows.
Apparently there is only the performance brake if you set more than one processor for Windows, although my Mac have 8 cores.
greeting
Michael Hofmann
Germany
Click to expand...
Thank you for your reply, Michael
May we ask you to try the clean boot and check the issue?
 
I have now started Windows 10 via a clean boot. All third party processes are disabled. A virus scanner is not installed. With 1 assigned processor in Parallels Desktop, Windows 10 is normally fast (approx. 10 seconds boot time). With 2 or more processors, Windows 10 is extremely slow even with clean boot (up to 10 minutes boot time and up to 1-2 minutes waiting time when you click something). So, a clean boot does not bring any improvement !
greeting
Michael Hofmann
Germany
 
MHofmann1965 said:
I have now started Windows 10 via a clean boot. All third party processes are disabled. A virus scanner is not installed. With 1 assigned processor in Parallels Desktop, Windows 10 is normally fast (approx. 10 seconds boot time). With 2 or more processors, Windows 10 is extremely slow even with clean boot (up to 10 minutes boot time and up to 1-2 minutes waiting time when you click something). So, a clean boot does not bring any improvement !
greeting
Michael Hofmann
Germany
Click to expand...
Does your Windows work ok with 1 CPU? Am I right?
 
Yes. My Windows 10 works perfectly with 1 CPU. But my Mac has 8 CPU cores and when I run Windows 10 with Parallels Desktop with more than 1 CPU, Windows 10 is extremely slow.
The standard setting in Parallels Desktop is 2 CPU cores for Windows 10. Windows is extremely slow then.
greeting
Michael Hofmann
Germany
 
I can confirm this behavior. I am up-to-date on both Mac OS and Windows and Parallels. I have 16 cores available on my Mac Mini. I have 6 devoted to my windows VM. When i boot up, CPU utilization is at 600% for the first 10 minutes then drops to nothing. Windows is unusable for those first 10 minutes. This has been an issue since July of last year and persisted through all new versions of both OSX and Parallels. Please advise.
 
me too in Mac Pro 3.1
One 1 CPU will be fast in Parallels, do not more than 1 .
what ever in Parallels latest version 16
 
Same here on two XEON (Mac Pro) machines.
As soon as more than one CPU is configured for use in the VM, everything slows down to unbearable performance. We have tested this on Win7 (32bit and 64bit), Windoes 10 (64bit) and even Linux. This is clearly a long standing bug in Parallels Desktop - we even tried older versions back to PD10 and PD11! Always same outcome.
Now the strange thing: If you run the same setup with more cores on an old Core2Duo machine (with 2 cores enabled for the VM) or Core i7 (i.e. 4 cores enabled), everything is fine and system performance is good while not hogging up resources (CPU load).
So - I think it boils down to some XEON related bug in PD.
How about doing something about this, Parallels, instead of throwing frequent upgrades at us users that do not fix it but instead claim to be compatible to the latest macOS versions (while the old ones still run fine on those newer OS)?
 
Thank you SO much! I have been dealing with this issue for months and just ran across your one-processor soluition and it fixed my performance problem! I would never have thought of trying that! Thanks again!
 
Wow, I'm on an M1 MacBook Pro. Just switched my VM over to only use 1 CPU and it is a WHOLE LOT FASTER (ironically).
 
Im not sure if its related but my win10 guest OS was so slow I couldnt use it anymore, this on a MBP 16 corei9 with 8 cpus and 24GB Memory given to the virtual environment. Today I disabled spotlight (settings - spotlight in mac os) on both Machintosh HD and also on my windows bootcamp (bootcamp partition was not used by parallels so it probobly didn't matter.) I also unclicked adaptive hypervisor. Now this really hit the spot. My parallels is again usable, such a difference, haven't tested which of the two that made the difference but my bet is on disabling spotlight.
 
Does parallels have any estimate about when this terrible problem will be resolved? been using parallels for many years and this is the worst problem I've ever seen.
 
Thank you so much for sharing this. I'd gotten to the point where I'd decided to ditch Parallels and just by a Windows machine instead. Glad I won't have to. Maybe Parallels can be persuaded to do some more testing before they make us buy their next, umm, "upgrade"?
 
Yes, thank you! I did check that, but nevertheless the solution that solved the problem was to assign 1 CPU and nothing more. I thank both MHofmann1965 for posting the solution/workaround and Parallels for giving me the possibility to use my (needed!) Windows programs on my Mac. Thanks to both!
 
Hi Michael (Hofmann 1965),
dein Hinweis hat mir nach langem Suchen geholfen ... Parallels ist jetzt (mit 1 CPU) nicht mehr unbrauchbar langsam, sondern nur noch langsam.
@paralells-Team:
- Mein System MacBook Pro 15, 2018, mit Mac OS Big Sur, neueste Version, 32 GB
- Parallels 17 Pro, Version 17.0.1 (51482)
- Windows 10, alle Updates eingespielt.
- Mein Parallels/Windows lief "seit Jahren" problemlos und schnell, seit einigen Monaten ist es unsäglich langsam (Tastatureingabe - 30 sec warten, immer wieder 1-3 min Pause ohne Reaktion).
- Jetzt, mit 1 CPU (vor "alle"), läuft es okay-ish. Nicht mehr unbrauchbar, aber langsam, sehr langsam.
UND: "Dieser PC erfüllt derzeit nicht alle Systemvoraussetzungen für Windows 11" ... WAS SOLL DAS DENN????
Mit sehr unzufriedenen Grüßen an das Parallels-Team
Michael
 
Ooops - sorry, here in English:

Hi Michael (Hofmann 1965),
your hint saved my life - Parallels (with 1 CPU) is now no longer unusable, but improved to only slow.

@paralells-Team:
- My System: MacBook Pro 15, 2018, mit Mac OS Big Sur, newest version, 32 GB
- Parallels 17 Pro, Version 17.0.1 (51482)
- Windows 10, all Updates done.
- My Parallels/Windows ran "since years" without any problems and fast. Since a few months it became horribly slow (key stroke - 30 sec waiting, severals time 1-3 min pause without any reaction).
- Now, with 1 CPU (was "all"), it runs okay-ish. Not any more unusable, but slow, very slow.
And: "Dieser PC erfüllt derzeit nicht alle Systemvoraussetzungen für Windows 11" (This PC does not fulfill all requirements for Windows 11) ... really, what's this???
With not very satisfied regards
Michael
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top