Parallels 11 only 8GB vRAM per VM?

FlemmingD said:
Hi,
I will stick with version 10 for now! I need the pro version but renting the software just doesn't make sense :(
I there is going to be a normal payed Pro version of version 11 I would buy that :)
Click to expand...

yep. Same here. I wouldn't mind paying $80,00 for the upgrade for a Pro version without that silly Access Subscription.
 
I have downloaded the base VMWARE Fusion 7 Trial and as opposed to what the advertising
smoke and mirrors of Parallels is saying, it lets you select as many CPUs and memory as you want.
Also lets you select large VRAM and as a matter of fact even recommended setting it at 1GB on my
machine. Took some time, about 30-40 min. to import a Win7 VM and some cleanup but seems
to work fine at this point. Graphics seem quite crisp and smooth.

If continued testing is favorable, I will look at how Win10 works and soon make a decision as
to whether to move to Fusion (at this point highly likely) unless Parallels changes and or amends the
current offerings to provide a perpetual Pro license.

I am guessing that any changes however are highly unlikely. When Adobe made the transition to
their ball and chain model, there was quite an outcry as here and they did not change their stance.
So, doubt if that will change here as well.
 
Looks like Fusion 8 was just released yesterday. I have been trying 7 and it works good and now going to check out 8. If 8 works well, they have a 40% discount for parallels users and no subscription. Plus, I like that for personal users they allow you to use it on all your personal Macs (do not need a copy for each).
 
GrinningShark said:
Looks like Fusion 8 was just released yesterday. I have been trying 7 and it works good and now going to check out 8. If 8 works well, they have a 40% discount for parallels users and no subscription. Plus, I like that for personal users they allow you to use it on all your personal Macs (do not need a copy for each).
Click to expand...
Will check out ASAP!!!

Follow up:
Fusion8 Standard $79.99 for use on 3 personal Macs
64GB vRAM/16 vCPUs
Open GL 3.3
DirectX 10
Upto 2GB VRAM
 
Last edited:
I took the plunge and bought Fusion 8 Pro with their upgrade deal (Pro has a few features I needed, they have had a Pro version for a while now so I'm guessing that is what Parallels is copying). Did a fresh install of Windows 10 and some of my development tools and I find that it performs great. Also tried a conversion from a Parallels VM to a VMWare VM and that worked surprisingly well and the resulting VM was actually a few gigs smaller than the Parallels one. Best part is that I had bought two copies of Parallels 10 previously to cover my desktop and my laptop, but had another computer I wanted to run it on but could not stomach buying a third copy (let alone doing a subscription for 2-3 machines). Not an issue with VMWare. It's been fun Parallels, but I'm signing off since I've jumped ship. ;)
 
Some people here pretend they will look at VMware or stick to PD 10. For those who wish to keep PD 10, Parallels may sleep well, most of users who want to upgrade sooner or later to Windows 10 will have to consider PD 11 anyway.

For this reason (please have a look on the following article): http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/year-old-parallels-and-vmware-software-wont-be-updated-for-windows-10/

For users who can live running Windows in a restrictive way, the last version of PD 10 (supposed to be Windows 10 compatible) is buggy anyway: version 10.2.2-29105 even brought problems with Windows 8.1 VM (I had to revert to PD 10.2.1-29006 since at the moment Parallels didn't release a new build to fix problems).

As usual, the "Resistance fighters" may be the fall guys* :( but for home/home office users, it's time to give VWware Fusion 8 a try.

* big software companies only care for home/home office users as long as they can use them for building their brand image and renowned. When it's done, forget about home/home office users (they represent "small" turnover while they usually cost too much on technical support front, problem Parallels always anticipated granting 3 months of support only).
The "pro" users who are mainly on target, who are also captive and get used to work in PD environment will probably don't change anything. Though Parallels is not Adobe, Adobe subscription business model worked with "pros". Adobe didn't care for home/home office users, except photographers' world (not before general outcry).
 
Last edited:
For those looking to take advantage of the current 40% discount for Fusion 8 for Parallels users who are making the switch, here's the link to the page:

https://store.vmware.com/fusionversusparallelsUS

This should redirect to your local region store, so look for the link on the page that says 'Fusion vs Parallels' or similar. There you can authenticate your current Parallels key to get the 40% discount.

Note that Fusion isn't perfect either: it's not as performant as Parallels, the speed difference is immediately noticeable, and some features are only in the Fusion 8 Pro version that are currently in PD10 (like linked clones, network management, etc). Fusion Pro is also a lot more expensive than Parallels Pro. Still, the current discount and license for 3 installs (for non-commercial use, otherwise it's single machine only) is quite attractive, especially if you really want your > 8GB VMs back without being shackled to a subscription with expiring software.
 
Well, I also have moved on to Fusion 8 and am saying good bye to Parallels.
For those interested, this is what I sent to the corporate management feedback page:
"To Those That Make Marketing Decisions At Parallels,
I actually first used your product on a Windows platform because of its support for Linux was better than VMWare Workstation.

When Apple made its move to the Intel platform, I had started to use the Fusion product
but eventually found some issues working with Linux. Remembering that Parallels solution
worked so well on a PC, I decided to try the Parallels Desktop for Mac product and not only
found that not only did it work well with my Linux requirement, it was far superior running
Windows (XP at the time) as well. This was at version 3 of your product and I gave up on
VWMare Fusion.

As I was pleased with the product I had continued to use it and starting with Parallels 7
was purchasing two upgrade licenses and every upgrade since as I had a requirement
to have both a desktop and laptop.

Every year the product was Improved and new features added and I dutifully updated my
systems with each update. The Parallels Desktop 11 came along.

The product was split into a crippled version with a perpetual license and a "Pro" version
which had what like to refer to as a "ball and chain license". If I wanted to continue with a
good product with some of the features I needed over the standard version, I would be
forced into a ball and chain license with an added service of Access which I have absolutely
no use for. I would then be forced to feed the "Parallels Pig" (coined the phrase from a cable
TV term) for ever and ever if I wanted to continue using the product.

One would say that "Well you updated every year so what is the difference?". Well, the
difference is, if I found a particular upgrade was not to my liking or added nothing to my
productivity, I could skip an upgrade and still have a functioning system and wait to upgrade
to a future version. I would have gladly paid a little more for a Pro upgrade (sans Access)
with a perpetual license.

So, with that said, it is with sadness and remorse that I must abandon the Parallels Desktop
for Mac product in favor of the VMWare Fusion product. Their base offering supplies more
than enough features to satisfy my needs (really somewhere between the Parallels base
and Pro, advertising fact manipulation aside) and with a perpetual license that is usable
on up to 3 computers.

In conclusion, your changes to the product line has resulted in at least this person
NOT purchasing TWO UPGRADE licenses, moving to a competitor's product, and never
buying any of your products again."

For those interested in supplying feedback to corporate management:
https://cscontact.parallels.com/form/25/
Doubt if they will listen, but at least let them know how you feel.
 
Yes, I was fooled too. Heavy depending on starting and stopping my virtual machines from the terminal using the parcel commands and bash script in OS X since i normally did not need any UI. This feature is now removed from the Desktop version I have used for years. It is removed without any notice about this when comparing the products that are easily spotted. I will probably terminate all use of Parallels and move to Vmware Fusion instead but first I will see if i can get my money back. This is just such a poor way of doing business when you think your customers are stupid!
 
UlfH1 said:
Yes, I was fooled too. Heavy depending on starting and stopping my virtual machines from the terminal using the parcel commands and bash script in OS X since i normally did not need any UI. This feature is now removed from the Desktop version I have used for years. It is removed without any notice about this when comparing the products that are easily spotted. I will probably terminate all use of Parallels and move to Vmware Fusion instead but first I will see if i can get my money back. This is just such a poor way of doing business when you think your customers are stupid!
Click to expand...
Yeah, you have to dig pretty deep into the Parallels 11 userguide pdf to discover that CLI control & access has been moved to Pro, along with the Vagrant provider, headless boot and port forwarding.
 
Ignoring the dubiousness of the changes to being with, the standard of communication about what features were in what versions has been utterly appalling.
 
Bill Standen said:
Ignoring the dubiousness of the changes to being with, the standard of communication about what features were in what versions has been utterly appalling.
Click to expand...

It's almost as if they didn't want users to know, really. It seems things came out bit by bit - finding out what was removed from PD10 and added to Pro. I think we still don't fully know what's totally been changed. All the while, we're treated to a flashy email that makes it sound like we'd be upgrading to the newer, better version like we always did.

To me, it feels like a bait and switch - and that's why I am DONE DONE DONE with Parallels, but sticking around here in hopes that the people at Parallels get their collective heads out of their lower orifices and stop directly being patronizing to users (I'm looking at you, Dishant - your attitude is the main reason I asked for a refund.)

It's not like Parallels doesn't have stiff competition. It seems most companies have to learn this the hard way, though.

Sucks, really. Looking at articles about the 2007 Macworld interview that Ars Technica did with Parallels. I used to really like these guys. Don't know what happened and who decided to start running things this way.
 
I have imported my 3 Windows VMs on one of my Machines to VMWare Fusion and all seem
to work just fine. The only issue is with activation of Windows 10 which I believe is an issue
on Microsloths end. Only problem is trying to get someone at Microsloth that has a clue what
a virtual machine is and getting bumped to Pro level support is no help with 2-3 hour wait times!

I am now happy that I have software that will work as long as I want it without having to feed the pig
to keep it working.

BTW, the letter I sent to management that I posted above received nothing but the standard automated
email reply for submitting it, not that I was expecting a reply since it is apparent that that Parallels doesn't
care about long time customers.
 
I too think it is poor that they moved features to a pro version, however can I just point out guys I paid the same for the pro version as I did a standard version last year so what's the issue really?
 
CarlH2 said:
I too think it is poor that they moved features to a pro version, however can I just point out guys I paid the same for the pro version as I did a standard version last year so what's the issue really?
Click to expand...
The issue is the fact if you do not pay that amount exactly one year from the time you paid
this year and every year there after, your Parallels Pro will cease to work and your virtual
machines will be useless.

You will need to continue to pay that amount whether there are upgrades or not to be able
to use Parallels Pro.

Basically, you have willingly bought yourself into a ball and chain.
 
EllwoodN said:
The issue is the fact if you do not pay that amount exactly one year from the time you paid
this year and every year there after, your Parallels Pro will cease to work and your virtual
machines will be useless.

You will need to continue to pay that amount whether there are upgrades or not to be able
to use Parallels Pro.

Basically, you have willingly bought yourself into a ball and chain.
Click to expand...

I upgrade anyway, oh well.
 
FWIW, this is the reply I received for the message I posted above that I had
sent to the Management Feedback:
"Hello,

Thank you for your feedback on the subscription licensing model.

I have forwarded it to the appropriate department for further consideration.

Thank you for sharing your opinion with us!

Thanks,

--

Ekaterina Zelenskaya
Customer Support
Consumer & SMB
|| Parallels"

Blah, blah, blah!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top