mikesax said:
Bottom line (for me):
1) I've paid Paralllels the $50, which is OK value for me, even though there's no customer service and USB support is virtually non-existent for my needs.
IME, most $50 products come with KB and FAQ support, and not personal support unless there's an actual bug in the product, and helping a customer will help them confirm the bug and fix it. That's just life in the software industry these days.
2) As soon as VMWare has a Mac solution I'll switch in a heart beat. I'll be very happy to pay $299 or more for a well working, well supported product.
Boy, there's motivation for Parallels to help you! What makes you think that VMWare will have a better solution? I'd guess there will be a different set of problems, but better? Maybe. Of course, if VMWare actually provides better handholding and you want to pay the price, fine, but for me at least, the current version of Parallels is useful, and I'm happy with it even though it doesn't do everything I want or everything I think it should. Improvements have been promised, and I'd rather have the current version that I can actually use NOW than wait for perfection a few months down the road.
Taking care of your customers is essential for long term success. I can sympathize that they have limited development and support resources, but they've released an unfinished product and they're putting their head in the sand with regards to the support situation, at the expense of their earliest customers.
Yes, in a sense it is an unfinished product, but if you look at Apple's very first Macintosh (if you were around then) and every Mac released since, including all the 68k based generations, the PPC versions, and now Intel, Apple has released a long string of useful but unfinished products, and will probably continue to do so for a long time. Every version of Windows since 3.1 (where I started) through today has been an unfinsihed product, as has every version of Linux, etc., etc.
Parallels will continue to improve the product, and each release will satisfy another group of users, and leave others unsatisfied. That's how life works.
I'd like full USB 2.0 pass through since one of my apps needs it and I have to keep a PC around until that happens (or use bootcamp, but the PC is less effort). Other folks would like better graphics support. Still others would like things that are either a truly huge amount of work (if possible at all), or would compromise the security of the VM concept and those things probably won't happen at all.
If you're starving, and really, really want roast beef and someone offers a peanut butter sandwich, do you maintain your high expectations and starve, or lower them and eat and survive? For me, I'll eat peanut butter today so I'll live to get the roast some other day.