Where can I see PDv10 vs. PDv11 comparison of features? I run Windows 10 in PDv10 already - even now on Parallels site, PDv10 is claimed to be the only version of Parallels Desktop 'optimized for Windows 10.' I've not seen any limitations (I run full screen desktop and switch between Windows/Mac).
In looking for information to help me decide whether an upgrade is worth it, I found that the PDv10 & PDv11 readme & user documentation on the Download page are exactly the same documents (that of version 10's, so where is the version 11 documentation?)
So far, I see nothing compelling about this upgrade - just hype & marketing. In fact, I see it as a potential downgrade. I'm worried that PDv11 is a crippled version of PDv10 - to have marketing room & features for a PDv11 Pro version, which may be the path back to full functionality. For example, PDv10 allows 64GB vRAM / 16 vCPUs per VM, but the PDv11/Pro comparison (Virtual RAM / virtual CPUs for each VM) makes it appear that PDv11 is capped at 8GB vRAM / 4 vCPUs. My present PDv10 Win10 runs 48GB vRAM / 8 vCPUs - it sounds like PDv11 would be a downgrade for me?! Furthermore, a link on this site purports to show information to back up the speed claims (some vmark data?) - it's just a picture of a link. Also missing: is it comparing PDv10 running Win10 with PDv11 running Win10? Without some more information, it's a meaningless claim. Parallels is overtly using Windows 10 to sell PDv11, so I would not be surprised if the speed increase is not almost entirely, if not 100% attributable to Windows 10 (vs Window 8.x ), and not advances in PDv11. I've clearly seen shorter boot time, docs open quicker, etc. running PDv10 & Win10.
Don't get me wrong - I love Parallels Desktop! I need clear information in order to justify $50 upgrade to PDv11, and I'm a bit concerned about the lack of information, and sometimes misleading information found on this website.
In looking for information to help me decide whether an upgrade is worth it, I found that the PDv10 & PDv11 readme & user documentation on the Download page are exactly the same documents (that of version 10's, so where is the version 11 documentation?)
So far, I see nothing compelling about this upgrade - just hype & marketing. In fact, I see it as a potential downgrade. I'm worried that PDv11 is a crippled version of PDv10 - to have marketing room & features for a PDv11 Pro version, which may be the path back to full functionality. For example, PDv10 allows 64GB vRAM / 16 vCPUs per VM, but the PDv11/Pro comparison (Virtual RAM / virtual CPUs for each VM) makes it appear that PDv11 is capped at 8GB vRAM / 4 vCPUs. My present PDv10 Win10 runs 48GB vRAM / 8 vCPUs - it sounds like PDv11 would be a downgrade for me?! Furthermore, a link on this site purports to show information to back up the speed claims (some vmark data?) - it's just a picture of a link. Also missing: is it comparing PDv10 running Win10 with PDv11 running Win10? Without some more information, it's a meaningless claim. Parallels is overtly using Windows 10 to sell PDv11, so I would not be surprised if the speed increase is not almost entirely, if not 100% attributable to Windows 10 (vs Window 8.x ), and not advances in PDv11. I've clearly seen shorter boot time, docs open quicker, etc. running PDv10 & Win10.
Don't get me wrong - I love Parallels Desktop! I need clear information in order to justify $50 upgrade to PDv11, and I'm a bit concerned about the lack of information, and sometimes misleading information found on this website.