Does Transporter need a new Windows License?

Discussion in 'Installation and Configuration of Parallels Desktop' started by stevenwr, Jan 28, 2008.

  1. stevenwr

    stevenwr Bit poster

    Messages:
    2
    I have installed Parallels (5582) and have successfully migrated my XP Home source image to the Mac (Leopard). Activated Parallels successfully and starting up the virtual pc for the first time. I get to the page where the Windows activation key is requested from the source computer. Microsoft doesn't accept it ("not a valid key"). I am directed to microsoft to buy an extended product license for the xp installed on the source computer.

    Should I be surprised? Should I fork out the extra $100 to run Transporter? 'zup?

    R
     
  2. Eru Ithildur

    Eru Ithildur Forum Maven

    Messages:
    1,954
    As long as you are only running it on one computer just give M$ a call and let them know as much.
     
  3. stevenwr

    stevenwr Bit poster

    Messages:
    2
    Thanks

    Thanks for the suggestion. I presume that the virtual pc now on the mac does not count as a separate machine.

    R
     
  4. Azbuckeyeracer

    Azbuckeyeracer Junior Member

    Messages:
    17
    I really think you will find that the vm installation certainly does qualify as an 'installation' of the Windows OS on a distinct 'machine' (virtual in this instance).
     

Share This Page