Is there a particular advantage to running sshfs here? It seems to me that the added security of sshfs comprises unnecessary overhead in this case, because it is possible to completely wall off the direct network connection between your host and guest OS.
For example, if you're running the guest OS on a host-only network, you can configure Mac OSX to serve NFS or SMB only over the host-only adapter. Even if you run Internet Connection Sharing to punch the guest OS out to the outside world, nobody can see how you're sharing files.
Or, if you want to use bridged networking, you can fix the firewall so that the the file service (NFS, SMB) goes only between the host and guest IP addresses.
So basically what I'm saying is that I'd probably be looking for the lightest-weight file sharing service I could find, and let the firewall offer the protection. Seems like it would be more efficient than encryption.
If there's a simple explanation as to why I'm wrong, I apologize in advance

Click to expand...